Selecting the correct cutting method is a crucial step in any fabrication project. Laser cutting, waterjet cutting and plasma cutting each has its own strength in terms of speed, accuracy and material range. Deciding between them can feel overwhelming.
In this blog post we will highlight the ten main differences which will help you match the best cutting technique to your needs, budget and quality expectations.
Cutting Mechanism & Heat Input
1. Laser Cutting

A focused beam of light forms the core of laser cutting. This beam melts a narrow path in the material and an assist gas blows the molten metal away. This method creates a small Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) which can change the material’s properties in that area.
2. Waterjet Cutting

Waterjet cutting relies on mechanical erosion. It uses water–pressurized up to 60,000 PSI and mixed with abrasive particles—to slice through material. As a cold cutting process, it produces almost no HAZ. This prevents thermal damage and keeps the material’s structure unchanged.
3. Plasma Cutting

Plasma cutting works by forming an arc of ionized gas that reaches 30,000°C. This arc melts conductive metals while a fast‐moving gas jet removes the molten metal. Plasma cutting produces the most heat & creates the largest HAZ among these methods.
Why Considering Heat Input Matters
Heat input has a major role in cutting quality. A heat affected zone can change material properties which can cause distortion and need extra finishing work. If you know how much heat every process introduces then this will help you protect part integrity and also control costs.
At RICHCONN, our engineers always evaluate heat input’s effect on part accuracy and surface finish. By studying how each material reacts we choose the best cutting method to keep dimensions stable and reduce rework.
Material Compatibility
Choice of the right cutting method depends largely on the material type. Every process comes with its own strengths & weaknesses.
Laser
Lasers work best for cutting metals like stainless steel, carbon steel as well as aluminum. Modern fiber lasers handle reflective metals better as compared to older CO₂ lasers. Some non‐metals, such as acrylic and wood, can also be cut with lasers.
Waterjet
Waterjet cutting offers the most versatility. It can cut nearly any material—including metals, stone, glass, plastics and composites. Cutting stacked sheets of different materials at once is also possible with waterjets.
Plasma
Plasma cutting only works with electrically conductive metals. It is very effective for steel, stainless steel as well as aluminum. Metal fabrication shops often prefer plasma for these materials.
Thickness Capacity & Speed Breakpoints
The method you select affects the maximum thickness you can cut. Speed and thickness are closely linked. Therefore understanding how they interact helps you balance project time and costs.
1. Speed vs Thickness
Lasers can cut thin sheets of metal faster than other methods. When material thickness goes beyond about 16 mm (5/8″), plasma cutting becomes faster than laser cutting.
In contrast waterjet is usually the slowest but it produces the best results on very thick materials—where other methods may struggle.
2. Typical Max Capacities (Modern Systems)
- Laser: Lasers work efficiently on materials up to 25 mm thick. High power fiber lasers can cut steel up to 40 mm.
- Waterjet: Waterjets usually cut materials between 50 and 100 mm thick. They can even reach up to 300 mm for some materials.
- Plasma: Plasma cutting can handle thick conductive plates with ease. It works best above 16 mm and can cut steel up to 80 mm thick.
Precision & Tolerances
Precision measures how well a cut part matches its design requirements. The three cutting methods deliver different levels of accuracy. This difference determines which applications suit each method best.
Waterjet
Among the three, waterjet cutting achieves the highest precision. It holds very tight tolerances, mostly between ±0.05 mm and ±0.1 mm. When parts need maximum accuracy and intricate details, waterjet stands out as the top choice.
Laser
Laser cutting also provides strong accuracy, particularly for sheet metal. It reliably maintains tolerances close to ±0.13 mm. This precision helps make complicated shapes and detailed parts with smooth, clean edges.
Plasma
Plasma cutting offers the widest tolerance range of the three. High definition plasma systems typically reach about ±0.5 mm. This level of accuracy fits structural projects where small differences do not cause problems.
Implication: When parts include fine features, small holes or require tight fits, higher precision becomes essential. Waterjet and laser cutting deliver the accuracy needed for these demanding tasks and help assure that the final part matches the design exactly.
Kerf Width & Small Feature Capability

Kerf is the width of material that a cutting process removes. Every method produces a different kerf size which affects how well it can handle small features.
Laser
Laser cutters make the narrowest kerf, usually between 0.2 and 0.4 mm. This slim cut works best for designs with fine details.
Waterjet
Waterjet machines cut a wider kerf, generally around 1.0 to 1.2 mm. But some micro‐jet setups can also create a smaller kerf when needed.
Plasma→ The Widest Cut
Plasma cutting results in the widest kerf, often 3.8 mm or more. This method suits larger parts that do not need fine features.
What It Means?
A smaller kerf allows for more detailed work. This makes it possible to create sharp inside corners and complicated part shapes without causing distortion.
Edge Quality, HAZ & Secondary Finishing
Choice of cutting method directly impacts the edge finish – and determines if post processing is needed.
Laser
Laser cutting delivers clean and smooth edges on thin and medium sheets. This process creates a very small Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) therefore the material’s properties stay almost the same. As a result most laser cut parts need little or no extra finishing.
Waterjet
Waterjet cutting achieves the highest level of surface integrity. Because it uses a cold process, there is no HAZ at all. Moreover the edges come out smooth and free of burrs; so no further finishing is necessary.
Plasma
Plasma cutting introduces a lot of heat which leads to a larger HAZ and more dross along the edge. These edges often need extra work, such as grinding or beveling, before welding or finishing. Modern high definition plasma systems have made edge quality much better.
At Richconn, finishing options like deburring, anodizing, passivation and powder coating are available for all three processes. These options help assure parts are ready to use with minimal post processing.
Speed, Throughput & Automation
Every cutting method offers a unique mix of speed and automation which affects production efficiency.
- Laser Cutting: Laser cutting works fastest on thin sheet metal. This process fits well with automation and supports “lights-out” manufacturing which greatly boosts efficiency. Therefore it is a top choice for the production of identical parts in large numbers.
- Waterjet Cutting: Waterjet cutting usually runs at slower speeds, limited by how fast abrasives flow and the thickness of the material. Its main advantage is the ability to cut very thick materials or stacked layers, which other methods cannot handle, while still keeping high quality.
- Plasma Cutting: Plasma cutting moves very quickly when working with medium or thick conductive plates. It is well suited for heavy fabrication and industrial jobs where speed matters most. With modern CNC controls, plasma systems achieve high and steady production rates for structural applications.
Operating Costs & Consumables
Laser Cutting
Laser cutting costs about $13 to $20 per hour to operate. For example cutting a 1 inch thick stainless steel plate usually costs $4 to $5 per linear inch. This figure includes electricity, labor & assist gas. This process is affordable for thin or medium parts. For thicker materials, the expense increases.
Waterjet Cutting
Waterjet cutting has the highest operating costs. Here cutting 1 inch of stainless steel can range from $4 to $6.50 per inch because garnet abrasive is expensive. Additionally maintaining the high pressure pump adds to the cost; and the slower cutting speed also contributes to the higher price.
Plasma Cutting
Plasma cutting offers the lowest cost for thick metals. Cutting 1 inch stainless steel through this method typically costs $1 to $2 per inch. Consumables like nozzles and electrodes are inexpensive. This process also works faster than laser cutting for thick plates—which helps keep costs down.
Environmental, Safety & Shop Impact
Every cutting technique influences the workshop environment in unique ways.
Noise
Waterjet machines produce the most noise, often above 90 decibels (dB). However cutting underwater can lower the noise to less than 75 dB. In contrast laser cutters are quieter and usually run at about 75 dB.
Plasma cutting, on the other hand, is also loud with noise between 90 and 120 dB. Therefore hearing protection is necessary for plasma operations.
Waste
Laser cutting generates very little waste and keeps the process clean. While waterjet cutting leaves behind a slurry made of used abrasive and water. This waste is non toxic but needs proper disposal. Compared to these two, plasma cutting produces fumes and dross therefore a strong ventilation system is important for safety.
Heat/ Warping
Waterjet cutting does not use heat therefore it avoids causing heat damage or warping. This is suitable for materials that are sensitive to heat. Whereas laser cutting creates only a small heat affected zone and this limits distortion. In contrast plasma cutting produces the most heat and carries the greatest risk of warping parts.
Part Geometry, Hole Quality & Beveling
Shape and features of your part influence which cutting method will deliver the best outcome.
Small Holes & Fine Features
Parts that need small holes or detailed features work best with laser or waterjet cutting. Lasers use a narrow kerf therefore they can handle intricate designs. Waterjets also create precise features and do not cause heat distortion. In contrast plasma cutting is not as effective for small details because it has a wider kerf and uses more heat.
Bevel Cutting
Plasma cutting stands out when you need beveled edges on thick plates, particularly for welding preparation. While laser and waterjet machines can have beveling heads, plasma is used more often and at a lower cost for this task.
Intricate Profiles in Thick, Exotic Materials
Waterjet cutting is a top choice for complicated shapes in thick or heat sensitive materials such as titanium or composites. It keeps accuracy high through the full thickness and does not create a heat affected zone.
Comparison Table: Laser vs Waterjet vs Plasma Cutting
| Factor | Laser Cutting | Waterjet Cutting | Plasma Cutting |
| Cutting Mechanism | Focused laser beam melts/ vaporizes material; uses assist gas | High pressure water with abrasive; cold mechanical erosion | Ionized gas arc melts and blows away metal |
| Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) | Small | None (cold process) | Large |
| Material Compatibility | Metals (SS, CS, Al); limited non metals | Almost any material (metal, stone, glass, composites) | Only conductive metals |
| Thickness Range | Best for thin‐medium sheet (<25 mm typical) | Typically for thick 50 to 100 mm plates | Great for thick conductive plates ( up to 80 mm thick.) |
| Cutting Speed | Fastest on thin sheet | Slowest overall | Fastest on thick metals |
| Precision/ Tolerance | ±0.13 mm typical | ±0.05 to 0.10 mm (microjets ±0.01 mm) | ±0.5 mm (HD plasma) |
| Kerf Width | 0.2 to 0.4 mm | 1.0 to 1.2 mm | 3.8mm+ |
| Edge Quality | Smooth, minimal dross | Extraordinary, burr‐free, no HAZ | Rougher, dross formation common |
| Operating Cost | Low‐moderate (gas + power) | Highest (abrasive + slow speed) | Lowest (fast + cheap consumables) |
| Automation & Throughput | Highly automatable; ideal for lights‐out operations | Moderate; slower cycle times | High throughput for fabrication work |
| Environmental Impact | Low waste, moderate fume | Abrasive/ water waste | Fume and noise—needs ventilation |
| Best Use Case | Fine, fast sheet‐metal parts | Precision work on thick/ mixed materials | Economical large/ thick metal fabrication |
RICHCONN provides all three cutting methods in one facility. Customers can select based on thickness, tolerance and cost.
Also See: What is the Difference Between Plasma Cutting and CNC Machining
Applications and Use Cases of Laser, Waterjet & Plasma Cutting
Different cutting methods suit different industrial needs.
Laser Cutting Applications
Laser cutting stands out for its ability to create parts with clean edges and high precision. Industries that need detailed work rely on this method. Manufacturers use laser cutting to produce many important components, including:
- Precision sheet metal parts such as panels, brackets and electronic enclosures.
- Electronics components like silicon wafers and delicate circuit boards.
- Medical devices including complicated surgical tools and small, life‐saving stents.
- Automotive components such as interior parts and custom body panels.
Waterjet Cutting Applications
Waterjet cutting does not generate heat therefore it works well with most materials and does not cause damage or distortion. This method is mostly used for
- Shaping sensitive materials like glass, tile, stone and composites that could crack or burn with other techniques.
- Creating detailed architectural elements such as granite countertops or custom floor tiles.
- Cutting through Multi Material Stacks including rubber‐lined metal plates or bonded composites.
Plasma Cutting Applications
Plasma cutting works best for thick, conductive metals. It offers fast cutting and cost savings when ultra‐fine precision is not needed. Most often, plasma cutting is used for
- Cutting structural steel for construction and infrastructure, including flanges, plate gussets and I-beams.
- Fabricating heavy industry components for heavy machinery manufacturing, repair yards and shipbuilding.
- Preparing beveled edges on thick steel plates for welding.
Which Method Should You Choose?
Every method offers a unique mix of speed, accuracy and material compatibility.
When to Choose Waterjet Cutting
Waterjet cutting is particularly effective for heat sensitive items like composites, glass, stone, plastics and metals where heat distortion poses a risk.
Why Choose It?
This process uses cold cutting therefore it does not form a Heat Affected Zone (HAZ). The material’s structure stays intact. Waterjet cutting also achieves tight tolerances of about ±0.05 mm and leaves a smooth edge.
Limitations
- Waterjet cutting is usually slower than laser or plasma methods.
- Abrasive use and pump upkeep make operating costs higher.
When to Choose Laser Cutting
Laser cutting suits thin to medium sheet metals that are up to 25 mm thick. It creates detailed shapes and clean edges.
Why Choose It?
Lasers can cut sheet metal at the highest speeds which increases throughput. This process also creates smooth edges that often need no extra finishing.
Limitations
- Laser cutting does not work as well on very thick plates.
- Reflective metals and some non metals need special setups for good results.
When to Choose Plasma Cutting
Plasma cutting is best for medium to thick conductive metals over 16 mm. It is the top choice when speed and lower costs matter more than perfect edge quality.
Why Choose It?
This method can cut heavy plates very quickly and at a low cost. Also, both equipment and running expenses are less than those of laser or waterjet cutting.
Limitations
- Plasma cutting produces a wider kerf and less precise tolerances.
- This process creates a large HAZ and dross—therefore edges often need cleaning before welding.
If you are unsure which cutting method fits your project, RICHCONN’s team can review your material, geometry and production needs to suggest the most efficient and affordable solution.
To Sum Up
The right choice among laser, waterjet and plasma cutting depends on what your project needs. Laser cutting works best for thin metals because it offers high speed along with accuracy. Waterjet cutting can handle almost any material and it avoids heat‐related damage. Whereas plasma cutting is the most affordable way to cut thick steel plates quickly.
If you need expert-level laser, waterjet or plasma cutting services then Richconn is your best option. You can contact us at any time.
Related Questions
Laser cutting delivers greater speed and accuracy for thin materials. Whereas waterjet cutting is better for thicker materials and for jobs where heat must not affect the workpiece.
Choose plasma cutting when you need to cut metals thicker than 16 mm, want faster processing for heavy plates or prefer lower equipment costs compared to laser systems.
Metal fabrication shops and machining centers mostly offer all these services. Look for providers with CNC precision centers, strong quality control and dependable turnaround times. Companies like Richconn supply all three cutting methods and have extensive technical knowledge in the machining field.



